GHSA-9GCF-PQ99-RJW3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:27 – Updated: 2024-10-21 21:24
VLAI?
Summary
RPLY Predictable Tmpfile Names Allows Cache Spoofing
Details
The parser cache functionality in parsergenerator.py in RPLY (aka python-rply) before 0.7.1 allows local users to spoof cache data by pre-creating a temporary rply-*.json file with a predictable name.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "rply"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.7.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-1604"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-377"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2023-08-16T22:49:38Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2014-01-28T00:55:00Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "The parser cache functionality in parsergenerator.py in RPLY (aka python-rply) before 0.7.1 allows local users to spoof cache data by pre-creating a temporary rply-*.json file with a predictable name.",
"id": "GHSA-9gcf-pq99-rjw3",
"modified": "2024-10-21T21:24:39Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T01:27:10Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-1604"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/alex/rply/commit/fc9bbcd25b0b4f09bbd6339f710ad24c129d5d7c"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/90593"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/alex/rply"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/rply/PYSEC-2014-17.yaml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=735263"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/01/17/8"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/01/18/4"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [],
"summary": "RPLY Predictable Tmpfile Names Allows Cache Spoofing"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…