GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-9H64-2846-7X7F

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-06 23:13 – Updated: 2026-05-06 23:13
VLAI
Summary
Axonflow fixed bugs by implementing multi-tenant isolation and access-control hardening
Details

Summary

Eight independently-filed bug fixes in the v7.1.3 → v7.5.0 release window collectively close a set of multi-tenant isolation, access-control, and policy-enforcement defects in the AxonFlow platform. They are filed as a single consolidated advisory because the recommended remediation is a single platform upgrade.

Affected versions

< 7.5.0. Specific items affect different earlier minors; see Impact below.

Patched versions

>= 7.5.0.

Impact

# Item Affected Patched CWE
1 MAP execution multi-tenant isolation. A body-supplied org_id could override the Basic-auth-derived org for both execution recording and policy evaluation. In multi-tenant deployments with shared agents, this could record one tenant's request under another tenant's audit log and evaluate it under the wrong tenant's policy set. < 7.4.5 >= 7.4.5 CWE-863
2 Cross-tenant audit-log leak via evidence/explain handlers. The handlers behind /api/v1/evidence/* and /api/v1/decisions/*/explain failed open when the tenant context was missing, returning data scoped to a different tenant or returning data without scope. < 7.2.0 >= 7.2.0 CWE-200, CWE-863
3 License-validation bypass on onboard-customer. The portal customer-onboard endpoint lacked authentication and license-key validation, allowing unauthenticated callers to invoke the onboard flow. < 7.2.0 >= 7.2.0 CWE-862
4 Tenant-scope fail-open on evidence/explain. Distinct from item 2: when tenant headers were absent, the handler defaulted to a permissive read scope rather than refusing the request. < 7.2.0 >= 7.2.0 CWE-862
5 Internal-service auth fallback bypass in non-Community modes. Evaluation/Enterprise builds carried an auth fallback path that, under specific request shapes, could be exploited to bypass apiAuthMiddleware. < 7.2.0 >= 7.2.0 CWE-863
6 Login timing / org-existence disclosure on the portal. The login handler returned different timing and response bodies for invalid-org vs invalid-password, allowing org enumeration. < 7.1.3 >= 7.1.3 CWE-208
7 Portal DoS via unbounded request body. The portal accepted unbounded request bodies, allowing memory-exhaustion attacks. Capped at 1 MiB. < 7.1.5 >= 7.1.5 CWE-770
8 SQL-injection enforcement regression on try.getaxonflow.com. The Community SaaS hosted endpoint inherited the warn SQLi default introduced in v6.2.0, allowing SQL-injection-shaped requests to pass governance to the LLM. Self-hosted deployments were unaffected unless they manually changed the default. < 7.5.0 (try.getaxonflow.com only) >= 7.5.0 CWE-89

Remediation

Upgrade to AxonFlow platform v7.5.0 or later. No configuration changes required — the platform is purely additive and existing API/SDK callers continue to work.

For users who can't upgrade immediately, item-specific mitigations:

  • Items 1–5: ensure the agent middleware sets X-Org-ID / X-Tenant-ID from authenticated identity at the ingress, never accepting body-supplied identity.
  • Item 8 (Community SaaS): SQLI_ACTION=block can be set explicitly via the agent task definition; v7.5.0 makes this the default.

Resources

  • AxonFlow v7.5.0 CHANGELOG entry: https://github.com/getaxonflow/axonflow/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md
  • AxonFlow v7.5.0 GitHub Release: https://github.com/getaxonflow/axonflow/releases/tag/v7.5.0

Credit

Identified by AxonFlow internal security review during the April 2026 quality-freeze epic.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/getaxonflow/axonflow"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "7.5.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-200",
      "CWE-208",
      "CWE-770",
      "CWE-862",
      "CWE-863",
      "CWE-89"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-06T23:13:27Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\n\nEight independently-filed bug fixes in the v7.1.3 \u2192 v7.5.0 release window collectively close a set of multi-tenant isolation, access-control, and policy-enforcement defects in the AxonFlow platform. They are filed as a single consolidated advisory because the recommended remediation is a single platform upgrade.\n\n## Affected versions\n\n`\u003c 7.5.0`. Specific items affect different earlier minors; see Impact below.\n\n## Patched versions\n\n`\u003e= 7.5.0`.\n\n## Impact\n\n| # | Item | Affected | Patched | CWE |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| 1 | **MAP execution multi-tenant isolation.** A body-supplied `org_id` could override the Basic-auth-derived org for both execution recording and policy evaluation. In multi-tenant deployments with shared agents, this could record one tenant\u0027s request under another tenant\u0027s audit log and evaluate it under the wrong tenant\u0027s policy set. | `\u003c 7.4.5` | `\u003e= 7.4.5` | CWE-863 |\n| 2 | **Cross-tenant audit-log leak via evidence/explain handlers.** The handlers behind `/api/v1/evidence/*` and `/api/v1/decisions/*/explain` failed open when the tenant context was missing, returning data scoped to a different tenant or returning data without scope. | `\u003c 7.2.0` | `\u003e= 7.2.0` | CWE-200, CWE-863 |\n| 3 | **License-validation bypass on `onboard-customer`.** The portal customer-onboard endpoint lacked authentication and license-key validation, allowing unauthenticated callers to invoke the onboard flow. | `\u003c 7.2.0` | `\u003e= 7.2.0` | CWE-862 |\n| 4 | **Tenant-scope fail-open on evidence/explain.** Distinct from item 2: when tenant headers were absent, the handler defaulted to a permissive read scope rather than refusing the request. | `\u003c 7.2.0` | `\u003e= 7.2.0` | CWE-862 |\n| 5 | **Internal-service auth fallback bypass in non-Community modes.** Evaluation/Enterprise builds carried an auth fallback path that, under specific request shapes, could be exploited to bypass `apiAuthMiddleware`. | `\u003c 7.2.0` | `\u003e= 7.2.0` | CWE-863 |\n| 6 | **Login timing / org-existence disclosure on the portal.** The login handler returned different timing and response bodies for invalid-org vs invalid-password, allowing org enumeration. | `\u003c 7.1.3` | `\u003e= 7.1.3` | CWE-208 |\n| 7 | **Portal DoS via unbounded request body.** The portal accepted unbounded request bodies, allowing memory-exhaustion attacks. Capped at 1 MiB. | `\u003c 7.1.5` | `\u003e= 7.1.5` | CWE-770 |\n| 8 | **SQL-injection enforcement regression on `try.getaxonflow.com`.** The Community SaaS hosted endpoint inherited the `warn` SQLi default introduced in v6.2.0, allowing SQL-injection-shaped requests to pass governance to the LLM. Self-hosted deployments were unaffected unless they manually changed the default. | `\u003c 7.5.0` (try.getaxonflow.com only) | `\u003e= 7.5.0` | CWE-89 |\n\n## Remediation\n\nUpgrade to AxonFlow platform **v7.5.0** or later. No configuration changes required \u2014 the platform is purely additive and existing API/SDK callers continue to work.\n\nFor users who can\u0027t upgrade immediately, item-specific mitigations:\n\n- **Items 1\u20135:** ensure the agent middleware sets `X-Org-ID` / `X-Tenant-ID` from authenticated identity at the ingress, never accepting body-supplied identity.\n- **Item 8 (Community SaaS):** `SQLI_ACTION=block` can be set explicitly via the agent task definition; v7.5.0 makes this the default.\n\n## Resources\n\n- AxonFlow v7.5.0 CHANGELOG entry: https://github.com/getaxonflow/axonflow/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md\n- AxonFlow v7.5.0 GitHub Release: https://github.com/getaxonflow/axonflow/releases/tag/v7.5.0\n\n## Credit\n\nIdentified by AxonFlow internal security review during the April 2026 quality-freeze epic.",
  "id": "GHSA-9h64-2846-7x7f",
  "modified": "2026-05-06T23:13:27Z",
  "published": "2026-05-06T23:13:27Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/getaxonflow/axonflow/security/advisories/GHSA-9h64-2846-7x7f"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/getaxonflow/axonflow"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/getaxonflow/axonflow/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/getaxonflow/axonflow/releases/tag/v7.5.0"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Axonflow fixed bugs by implementing multi-tenant isolation and access-control hardening"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…