ghsa-9hf6-wfwp-jr92
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-04 00:29
Modified
2022-05-04 00:29
Details
The SSHv2 implementation in Cisco IOS 12.2, 12.4, 15.0, 15.1, and 15.2 and IOS XE 2.3.x through 2.6.x and 3.1.xS through 3.4.xS before 3.4.2S allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via a crafted username in a reverse SSH login attempt, aka Bug ID CSCtr49064.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2012-0386", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2012-03-29T11:01:00Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "The SSHv2 implementation in Cisco IOS 12.2, 12.4, 15.0, 15.1, and 15.2 and IOS XE 2.3.x through 2.6.x and 3.1.xS through 3.4.xS before 3.4.2S allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via a crafted username in a reverse SSH login attempt, aka Bug ID CSCtr49064.", id: "GHSA-9hf6-wfwp-jr92", modified: "2022-05-04T00:29:44Z", published: "2022-05-04T00:29:44Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-0386", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/74404", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://osvdb.org/80695", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/48609", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/48641", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20120328-ssh", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/52752", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1026866", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.