GHSA-9HFH-P7QH-475C

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-24 09:30 – Updated: 2026-06-28 09:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

netfilter: ip6t_hbh: reject oversized option lists

struct ip6t_opts stores at most IP6T_OPTS_OPTSNR option descriptors, but hbh_mt6_check() does not reject larger optsnr values supplied from userspace.

Validate optsnr in the rule setup path so only match data that fits the fixed-size opts array can be installed. This follows the existing xtables pattern of rejecting invalid user-provided counts in checkentry() and keeps the packet matching path unchanged.

struct ip6t_opts has a fixed opts[IP6T_OPTS_OPTSNR] array, where IP6T_OPTS_OPTSNR is 16, then off-by-one array access is possible:

[ 137.924693][ T8692] UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in ../net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6t_hbh.c:110:29 [ 137.926167][ T8692] index 16 is out of range for type '__u16 [16]'

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-52915"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-24T08:16:21Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnetfilter: ip6t_hbh: reject oversized option lists\n\nstruct ip6t_opts stores at most IP6T_OPTS_OPTSNR option descriptors,\nbut hbh_mt6_check() does not reject larger optsnr values supplied from\nuserspace.\n\nValidate optsnr in the rule setup path so only match data that fits the\nfixed-size opts array can be installed. This follows the existing xtables\npattern of rejecting invalid user-provided counts in checkentry() and\nkeeps the packet matching path unchanged.\n\n`struct ip6t_opts` has a fixed `opts[IP6T_OPTS_OPTSNR]` array,\nwhere `IP6T_OPTS_OPTSNR` is 16, then off-by-one array access is possible:\n\n[  137.924693][ T8692] UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in ../net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6t_hbh.c:110:29\n[  137.926167][ T8692] index 16 is out of range for type \u0027__u16 [16]\u0027",
  "id": "GHSA-9hfh-p7qh-475c",
  "modified": "2026-06-28T09:31:35Z",
  "published": "2026-06-24T09:30:47Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-52915"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2d523ba48d4ecc46acfb6aba548292cfcce1ac02"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/41ec2e242f1702e8370ddfe14d22b7a766021c3e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4322dcde6b4173c2d8e8e6118ed290794263bcc8"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/57b0ac5e1b46f1f0338dff392ef2092e2871b412"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/588933f1a2ca5ff99274f8c9f25dc3a25d0191c3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6feb43c0995ab3a9c826707eb46541a1696fe4f7"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/784aadea7a108c9f90985683caa87fb0198c6a39"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/db0250470f023f159094052c0bd5ab026a88ae93"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…