ghsa-9jv3-jc56-rv4g
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-03-03 00:30
Modified
2024-12-11 15:31
Severity ?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: rds: Fix possible NULL-pointer dereference
In rds_rdma_cm_event_handler_cmn() check, if conn pointer exists before dereferencing it as rdma_set_service_type() argument
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2023-52573" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-476" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2024-03-02T22:15:49Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: rds: Fix possible NULL-pointer dereference\n\nIn rds_rdma_cm_event_handler_cmn() check, if conn pointer exists\nbefore dereferencing it as rdma_set_service_type() argument\n\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.", "id": "GHSA-9jv3-jc56-rv4g", "modified": "2024-12-11T15:31:15Z", "published": "2024-03-03T00:30:32Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52573" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/069ac51c37a6f07a51f7134d8c34289075786a35" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/51fa66024a5eabf270164f2dc82a48ffb35a12e9" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/812da2a08dc5cc75fb71e29083ea20904510ac7a" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ea82139e6e3561100d38d14401d57c0ea93fc07e" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f1d95df0f31048f1c59092648997686e3f7d9478" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f515112e833791001aaa8ab886af3ca78503617f" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.