GHSA-9M9C-M3M8-59VC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-30 18:31 – Updated: 2025-06-10 09:30Android based smartphones from vendors such as Ulefone and Krüger&Matz contain "com.pri.factorytest" application preloaded onto devices during manufacturing process. The application "com.pri.factorytest" (version name: 1.0, version code: 1) exposes a ”com.pri.factorytest.emmc.FactoryResetService“ service allowing any application to perform a factory reset of the device. Application update did not increment the APK version. Instead, it was bundled in OS builds released later than December 2024 (Ulefone) and most probably March 2025 (Krüger&Matz, although the vendor has not confirmed it, so newer releases might be vulnerable as well).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-13915"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-926"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-05-30T16:15:35Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Android based smartphones from vendors such as Ulefone and\u00a0Kr\u00fcger\u0026Matz contain \"com.pri.factorytest\" application preloaded onto devices during manufacturing process.\nThe application\u00a0\"com.pri.factorytest\"\u00a0(version name: 1.0, version code: 1)\u00a0exposes a \u201dcom.pri.factorytest.emmc.FactoryResetService\u201c service allowing any application to perform a factory reset of the device.\u00a0\nApplication update did not increment the APK version. Instead, it was bundled in OS builds released later than December 2024 (Ulefone) and most probably March 2025 (Kr\u00fcger\u0026Matz, although the vendor has not confirmed it, so newer releases might be vulnerable as well).",
"id": "GHSA-9m9c-m3m8-59vc",
"modified": "2025-06-10T09:30:30Z",
"published": "2025-05-30T18:31:13Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-13915"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cert.pl/en/posts/2025/05/CVE-2024-13915"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.