ghsa-9mpf-qr4j-4fp9
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 04:29
Modified
2022-05-17 04:29
Details
hw/usb/bus.c in QEMU 1.6.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted savevm data, which triggers a heap-based buffer overflow, related to "USB post load checks."
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2014-3461" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2014-11-04T21:55:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "hw/usb/bus.c in QEMU 1.6.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted savevm data, which triggers a heap-based buffer overflow, related to \"USB post load checks.\"", "id": "GHSA-9mpf-qr4j-4fp9", "modified": "2022-05-17T04:29:54Z", "published": "2022-05-17T04:29:54Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-3461" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014:0674" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014:0743" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014:0744" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014:0888" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014:0927" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014:1268" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-3461" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096821" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/272092" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2014-June/134053.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0743.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0744.html" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.