ghsa-9mvr-f38r-9r65
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:13
Modified
2022-05-13 01:13
Severity ?
Details
Heap-based buffer overflow in the .receive callback of xlnx.xps-ethernetlite in QEMU (aka Quick Emulator) allows attackers to execute arbitrary code on the QEMU host via a large ethlite packet.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2016-7161" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-787" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2016-10-05T16:59:00Z", "severity": "CRITICAL" }, "details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in the .receive callback of xlnx.xps-ethernetlite in QEMU (aka Quick Emulator) allows attackers to execute arbitrary code on the QEMU host via a large ethlite packet.", "id": "GHSA-9mvr-f38r-9r65", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:13:29Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:13:29Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-7161" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/11/msg00038.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-08/msg01598.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-08/msg01877.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201611-11" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=commit;h=a0d1cbdacff5df4ded16b753b38fdd9da6092968" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-12/msg00140.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/09/23/6" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/09/23/8" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93141" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.