ghsa-9pvj-32x2-9jrc
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:05
Modified
2022-05-13 01:05
Details
Buffer overflow in ngx_http_mp4_module.c in the ngx_http_mp4_module module in nginx 1.0.7 through 1.0.14 and 1.1.3 through 1.1.18, when the mp4 directive is used, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory overwrite) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted MP4 file.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2012-2089" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-120" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2012-04-17T21:55:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Buffer overflow in ngx_http_mp4_module.c in the ngx_http_mp4_module module in nginx 1.0.7 through 1.0.14 and 1.1.3 through 1.1.18, when the mp4 directive is used, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory overwrite) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted MP4 file.", "id": "GHSA-9pvj-32x2-9jrc", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:05:17Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:05:17Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-2089" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/74831" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-April/079388.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-May/079467.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-May/079474.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://nginx.org/en/security_advisories.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/04/12/9" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/52999" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1026924" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.