ghsa-9pwf-jxj3-pf4m
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 01:06
Modified
2022-05-17 01:06
Details
Integer underflow in the MPEG4Extractor::parseChunk function in MPEG4Extractor.cpp in libstagefright in mediaserver in Android before 5.1.1 LMY48M allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted MPEG-4 data, aka internal bug 23034759. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2015-3824.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2015-3864" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2015-10-01T00:59:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Integer underflow in the MPEG4Extractor::parseChunk function in MPEG4Extractor.cpp in libstagefright in mediaserver in Android before 5.1.1 LMY48M allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted MPEG-4 data, aka internal bug 23034759. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2015-3824.", "id": "GHSA-9pwf-jxj3-pf4m", "modified": "2022-05-17T01:06:05Z", "published": "2022-05-17T01:06:05Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-3864" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://android.googlesource.com/platform/frameworks/av/+/6fe85f7e15203e48df2cc3e8e1c4bc6ad49dc968" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://blog.zimperium.com/cve-2015-3864-metasploit-module-now-available-for-testing" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://blog.zimperium.com/reflecting-on-stagefright-patches" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://groups.google.com/forum/message/raw?msg=android-security-updates/1M7qbSvACjo/Y7jewiW1AwAJ" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/38226" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39640" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/40436" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/76682" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.