GHSA-9Q29-G37M-5WMP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 02:05 – Updated: 2025-10-22 03:30
VLAI?
Details
Cisco IOS XR 3.4.0 through 3.9.1, when BGP is enabled, does not properly handle unrecognized transitive attributes, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (peering reset) via a crafted prefix announcement, as demonstrated in the wild in August 2010 with attribute type code 99, aka Bug ID CSCti62211.
Severity ?
7.5 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2010-3035"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2010-08-30T21:00:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cisco IOS XR 3.4.0 through 3.9.1, when BGP is enabled, does not properly handle unrecognized transitive attributes, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (peering reset) via a crafted prefix announcement, as demonstrated in the wild in August 2010 with attribute type code 99, aka Bug ID CSCti62211.",
"id": "GHSA-9q29-g37m-5wmp",
"modified": "2025-10-22T03:30:28Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T02:05:47Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-3035"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/61443"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2010-3035"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2010-August/024837.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://osvdb.org/67696"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/41190"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080b4411f.shtml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1024371"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/2227"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…