GHSA-9Q29-W6F4-HC36

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-09-20 18:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 07:46
VLAI?
Details

The PaperCutNG Mobility Print version 1.0.3512 application allows an

unauthenticated attacker to perform a CSRF attack on an instance

administrator to configure the clients host (in the "configure printer

discovery" section). This is possible because the application has no

protections against CSRF attacks, like Anti-CSRF tokens, header origin

validation, samesite cookies, etc.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-2508"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-09-20T16:15:12Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The `PaperCutNG Mobility Print` version 1.0.3512 application allows an\n\nunauthenticated attacker to perform a CSRF attack on an instance\n\nadministrator to configure the clients host (in the \"configure printer\n\ndiscovery\" section). This is possible because the application has no\n\nprotections against CSRF attacks, like Anti-CSRF tokens, header origin\n\nvalidation, samesite cookies, etc.\n\n\n\n",
  "id": "GHSA-9q29-w6f4-hc36",
  "modified": "2024-04-04T07:46:20Z",
  "published": "2023-09-20T18:30:21Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-2508"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://fluidattacks.com/advisories/solveig"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.papercut.com/help/manuals/mobility-print/release-history/#mobility-print-server"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…