ghsa-9q67-fpxq-mm5h
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 03:41
Modified
2022-05-17 03:41
Details

Heap-based buffer overflow in Panasonic FPWIN Pro 5.x through 7.x before 7.130 allows local users to cause a denial of service (application crash) via unspecified vectors.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2016-4499"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2016-05-12T01:59:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in Panasonic FPWIN Pro 5.x through 7.x before 7.130 allows local users to cause a denial of service (application crash) via unspecified vectors.",
  "id": "GHSA-9q67-fpxq-mm5h",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T03:41:21Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T03:41:21Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-4499"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSA-16-131-01"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/90522"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-16-330"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-16-331"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...
  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.