ghsa-9qgp-g97v-qq69
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 03:32
Modified
2022-05-14 03:32
Severity ?
Details
Under certain circumstances, the ix86_expand_builtin function in i386.c in GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) version 4.6, 4.7, 4.8, 4.9, 5 before 5.5, and 6 before 6.4 will generate instruction sequences that clobber the status flag of the RDRAND and RDSEED intrinsics before it can be read, potentially causing failures of these instructions to go unreported. This could potentially lead to less randomness in random number generation.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2017-11671" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-338" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2017-07-26T21:29:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Under certain circumstances, the ix86_expand_builtin function in i386.c in GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) version 4.6, 4.7, 4.8, 4.9, 5 before 5.5, and 6 before 6.4 will generate instruction sequences that clobber the status flag of the RDRAND and RDSEED intrinsics before it can be read, potentially causing failures of these instructions to go unreported. This could potentially lead to less randomness in random number generation.", "id": "GHSA-9qgp-g97v-qq69", "modified": "2022-05-14T03:32:25Z", "published": "2022-05-14T03:32:25Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-11671" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0849" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80180" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-03/msg01349.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/07/27/2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100018" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.