ghsa-9qj5-r3c5-c7r3
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 05:45
Modified
2022-05-17 05:45
Details

Memory leak in IBM Lotus Notes Traveler before 8.5.1.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption and daemon outage) by sending many embedded objects in e-mail messages for iPhone clients.

Show details on source website


{
   affected: [],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2010-4552",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [],
      github_reviewed: false,
      github_reviewed_at: null,
      nvd_published_at: "2010-12-16T20:00:00Z",
      severity: "MODERATE",
   },
   details: "Memory leak in IBM Lotus Notes Traveler before 8.5.1.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption and daemon outage) by sending many embedded objects in e-mail messages for iPhone clients.",
   id: "GHSA-9qj5-r3c5-c7r3",
   modified: "2022-05-17T05:45:26Z",
   published: "2022-05-17T05:45:26Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-4552",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1LO46561",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www-10.lotus.com/ldd/dominowiki.nsf/dx/Lotus_Notes_Traveler_851_FP3_Release_Notes",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www-10.lotus.com/ldd/dominowiki.nsf/page.xsp?documentId=A6604E906E0DF2DF8525778B005D4466&action=openDocument",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.