ghsa-9qw2-jqcg-348f
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 01:48
Modified
2022-05-01 01:48
Details
Format string vulnerability in the SetImageInfo function in image.c for ImageMagick before 6.0.2.5 may allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via format string specifiers in a filename argument to convert, which may be called by other web applications.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2005-0397" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2005-05-02T04:00:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Format string vulnerability in the SetImageInfo function in image.c for ImageMagick before 6.0.2.5 may allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via format string specifiers in a filename argument to convert, which may be called by other web applications.", "id": "GHSA-9qw2-jqcg-348f", "modified": "2022-05-01T01:48:53Z", "published": "2022-05-01T01:48:53Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-0397" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/19586" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A10302" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83542" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=110987256010857\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2005/dsa-702" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200503-11.xml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.novell.com/linux/security/advisories/2005_17_imagemagick.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2005-070.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2005-320.html" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.