ghsa-9rm6-q34g-q949
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 17:34
Modified
2022-05-24 17:34
Details

Uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability in MELSEC iQ-R Series modules (R00/01/02CPU firmware version '19' and earlier, R04/08/16/32/120 (EN) CPU firmware version '51' and earlier, R08/16/32/120SFCPU firmware version '22' and earlier, R08/16/32/120PCPU all versions, R08/16/32/120PSFCPU all versions, RJ71EN71 firmware version '47' and earlier, RJ71GF11-T2 firmware version '47' and earlier, RJ72GF15-T2 firmware version '07' and earlier, RJ71GP21-SX firmware version '47' and earlier, RJ71GP21S-SX firmware version '47' and earlier, RJ71C24 (-R2/R4) all versions, and RJ71GN11-T2 all versions) allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause an error in a CPU unit and cause a denial-of-service (DoS) condition in execution of the program and its communication, or to cause a denial-of-service (DoS) condition in communication via the module by a specially crafted SLMP packet

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-5668"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-400"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2020-11-20T04:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability in MELSEC iQ-R Series modules (R00/01/02CPU firmware version \u002719\u0027 and earlier, R04/08/16/32/120 (EN) CPU firmware version \u002751\u0027 and earlier, R08/16/32/120SFCPU firmware version \u002722\u0027 and earlier, R08/16/32/120PCPU all versions, R08/16/32/120PSFCPU all versions, RJ71EN71 firmware version \u002747\u0027 and earlier, RJ71GF11-T2 firmware version \u002747\u0027 and earlier, RJ72GF15-T2 firmware version \u002707\u0027 and earlier, RJ71GP21-SX firmware version \u002747\u0027 and earlier, RJ71GP21S-SX firmware version \u002747\u0027 and earlier, RJ71C24 (-R2/R4) all versions, and RJ71GN11-T2 all versions) allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause an error in a CPU unit and cause a denial-of-service (DoS) condition in execution of the program and its communication, or to cause a denial-of-service (DoS) condition in communication via the module by a specially crafted SLMP packet",
  "id": "GHSA-9rm6-q34g-q949",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T17:34:41Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T17:34:41Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-5668"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://jvn.jp/vu/JVNVU95980140/index.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://us-cert.cisa.gov/ics/advisories/icsa-20-324-05"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.mitsubishielectric.co.jp/psirt/vulnerability/pdf/2020-016.pdf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.mitsubishielectric.com/en/psirt/vulnerability/pdf/2020-016_en.pdf"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.