GHSA-9RRQ-CFXH-G36J
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 18:42 – Updated: 2025-04-09 03:49
VLAI?
Details
registry.pl in Fonality Trixbox 2.0 PBX products, when running in certain environments, reads and executes a set of commands from a remote web site without sufficiently validating the origin of the commands, which allows remote attackers to disable trixbox and execute arbitrary commands via a DNS spoofing attack.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2007-6424"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2007-12-18T19:46:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "registry.pl in Fonality Trixbox 2.0 PBX products, when running in certain environments, reads and executes a set of commands from a remote web site without sufficiently validating the origin of the commands, which allows remote attackers to disable trixbox and execute arbitrary commands via a DNS spoofing attack.",
"id": "GHSA-9rrq-cfxh-g36j",
"modified": "2025-04-09T03:49:23Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T18:42:50Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-6424"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://osvdb.org/44136"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://voipsa.org/blog/2007/12/17/trixbox-contains-phone-home-code-to-retrieve-arbitrary-commands-to-execute"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://voipsa.org/pipermail/voipsec_voipsa.org/2007-December/002522.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://voipsa.org/pipermail/voipsec_voipsa.org/2007-December/002528.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://voipsa.org/pipermail/voipsec_voipsa.org/2007-December/002533.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.superunknown.org/pivot/entry.php?id=15"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.trixbox.org/forums/trixbox-forums/open-discussion/trixbox-phones-home"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…