GHSA-9VCR-P3RJ-Q5Q6

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-09 23:20 – Updated: 2026-07-31 20:17
VLAI
Summary
sigstore-go has a multi-log threshold bypass via single compromised log
Details

Impact

What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?

A verifier configured with WithTransparencyLog(N>1) or WithSignedCertificateTimestamps(N>1) expected defense-in-depth against the compromise of a single log instance. However, threshold counting counted verified witnesses per-entry or per-validation-path rather than per-log-authority.

As a result, a single compromised transparency log could forge multiple entries with different indices, and a single compromised CT log could verify multiple times (either across multiple certificate chains or via multiple embedded SCTs), fully satisfying the multi-log threshold requirements and defeating the multi-log policy.

Note that this does not affect Cosign, as Cosign sets a threshold of 1.

Patches

Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?

Upgrade to v1.1.5.

Workarounds

Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?

There is no workaround, beyond relying on trusted logs.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 1.1.4"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/sigstore/sigstore-go"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.2.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-49834"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-345",
      "CWE-347"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-07-09T23:20:30Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-17T20:17:21Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\n_What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?_\n\nA verifier configured with WithTransparencyLog(N\u003e1) or WithSignedCertificateTimestamps(N\u003e1) expected defense-in-depth against the compromise of a single log instance. However, threshold counting counted verified witnesses per-entry or per-validation-path rather than per-log-authority.\n\nAs a result, a single compromised transparency log could forge multiple entries with different indices, and a single compromised CT log could verify multiple times (either across multiple certificate chains or via multiple embedded SCTs), fully satisfying the multi-log threshold requirements and defeating the multi-log policy.\n\nNote that this does not affect Cosign, as Cosign sets a threshold of 1.\n\n### Patches\n_Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?_\n\nUpgrade to v1.1.5.\n\n### Workarounds\n_Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?_\n\nThere is no workaround, beyond relying on trusted logs.",
  "id": "GHSA-9vcr-p3rj-q5q6",
  "modified": "2026-07-31T20:17:30Z",
  "published": "2026-07-09T23:20:30Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/sigstore/sigstore-go/security/advisories/GHSA-9vcr-p3rj-q5q6"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-49834"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/sigstore/sigstore-go/pull/633"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/sigstore/sigstore-go/commit/dbb07e62623edd5b175fb9dd5a41dcb85a159207"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/sigstore/sigstore-go"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/sigstore/sigstore-go/releases/tag/v1.2.0"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "sigstore-go has a multi-log threshold bypass via single compromised log"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…