ghsa-9wxc-375c-cvq2
Vulnerability from github
Published
2021-11-23 00:00
Modified
2021-11-27 00:00
Details
The uri-block plugin in Apache APISIX before 2.10.2 uses $request_uri without verification. The $request_uri is the full original request URI without normalization. This makes it possible to construct a URI to bypass the block list on some occasions. For instance, when the block list contains "^/internal/", a URI like //internal/
can be used to bypass it. Some other plugins also have the same issue. And it may affect the developer's custom plugin.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2021-43557", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-77", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2021-11-22T09:15:00Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "The uri-block plugin in Apache APISIX before 2.10.2 uses $request_uri without verification. The $request_uri is the full original request URI without normalization. This makes it possible to construct a URI to bypass the block list on some occasions. For instance, when the block list contains \"^/internal/\", a URI like `//internal/` can be used to bypass it. Some other plugins also have the same issue. And it may affect the developer's custom plugin.", id: "GHSA-9wxc-375c-cvq2", modified: "2021-11-27T00:00:25Z", published: "2021-11-23T00:00:52Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-43557", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread/18jyd458ptocr31rnkjs71w4h366mv7h", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/11/22/1", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/11/22/2", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/11/23/1", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.