GHSA-C2F7-RHW7-9M5R

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-10 15:33 – Updated: 2026-08-10 15:33
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

tracing: Fix union collision of module and refcnt for dynamic events

In 'struct trace_event_call', the 'module' pointer and the 'refcnt' atomic variable share the same memory space in a union. For dynamic events, the union member is 'refcnt', which acts as an active reference counter.

When a dynamic event (such as kprobe, uprobe, fprobe, eprobe, or wprobe) has a non-zero reference count (e.g. due to active event triggers or perf attachments), its 'call->module' evaluates to a small non-zero integer instead of NULL.

When filtering or setting events for a specific module (e.g., writing ':mod:' to 'set_event'), the code in '__ftrace_set_clr_event_nolock()' and 'update_event_fields()' reads 'call->module' directly without checking whether the event is dynamic. This causes the kernel to treat the small integer (refcnt) as a 'struct module' pointer, leading to a NULL/invalid pointer dereference (Oops) when dereferencing the module name.

Fix this by ensuring that the 'TRACE_EVENT_FL_DYNAMIC' flag is checked before treating 'call->module' as a valid pointer in these code paths.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-68174"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-10T13:20:04Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ntracing: Fix union collision of module and refcnt for dynamic events\n\nIn \u0027struct trace_event_call\u0027, the \u0027module\u0027 pointer and the \u0027refcnt\u0027\natomic variable share the same memory space in a union. For dynamic\nevents, the union member is \u0027refcnt\u0027, which acts as an active\nreference counter.\n\nWhen a dynamic event (such as kprobe, uprobe, fprobe, eprobe, or\nwprobe) has a non-zero reference count (e.g. due to active event\ntriggers or perf attachments), its \u0027call-\u003emodule\u0027 evaluates to a\nsmall non-zero integer instead of NULL.\n\nWhen filtering or setting events for a specific module (e.g., writing\n\u0027:mod:\u003cmodule\u003e\u0027 to \u0027set_event\u0027), the code in\n\u0027__ftrace_set_clr_event_nolock()\u0027 and \u0027update_event_fields()\u0027 reads\n\u0027call-\u003emodule\u0027 directly without checking whether the event is dynamic.\nThis causes the kernel to treat the small integer (refcnt) as a\n\u0027struct module\u0027 pointer, leading to a NULL/invalid pointer dereference\n(Oops) when dereferencing the module name.\n\nFix this by ensuring that the \u0027TRACE_EVENT_FL_DYNAMIC\u0027 flag is checked\nbefore treating \u0027call-\u003emodule\u0027 as a valid pointer in these code paths.",
  "id": "GHSA-c2f7-rhw7-9m5r",
  "modified": "2026-08-10T15:33:39Z",
  "published": "2026-08-10T15:33:39Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-68174"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/43a23dfe0024afd3d2b0232e987d0292919a9b24"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b4eb07bde606c2096b24252be589e735eff6d413"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b6a4575f22925da7e6aa00171e9fc0e5029c0bc9"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…