GHSA-C35H-X7VF-692J

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 02:13 – Updated: 2022-05-01 02:13
VLAI?
Details

Multiple heap-based and stack-based buffer overflows in certain DCOM server components in VERITAS Storage Exec Storage Exec 5.3 before Hotfix 9 and StorageCentral 5.2 before Hot Fix 2 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via certain ActiveX controls.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2005-2996"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2005-09-20T22:03:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Multiple heap-based and stack-based buffer overflows in certain DCOM server components in VERITAS Storage Exec Storage Exec 5.3 before Hotfix 9 and StorageCentral 5.2 before Hot Fix 2 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via certain ActiveX controls.",
  "id": "GHSA-c35h-x7vf-692j",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T02:13:30Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T02:13:30Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-2996"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/16871"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/security/Content/2005.09.19.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/620497"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/927793"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…