ghsa-c3px-pvp2-35hw
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 23:37
Modified
2022-05-01 23:37
Details
A certain pseudo-random number generator (PRNG) algorithm that uses XOR and 3-bit random hops (aka "Algorithm X3"), as used in OpenBSD 2.8 through 4.2, allows remote attackers to guess sensitive values such as DNS transaction IDs by observing a sequence of previously generated values. NOTE: this issue can be leveraged for attacks such as DNS cache poisoning against OpenBSD's modification of BIND.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2008-1146" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2008-03-04T23:44:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "A certain pseudo-random number generator (PRNG) algorithm that uses XOR and 3-bit random hops (aka \"Algorithm X3\"), as used in OpenBSD 2.8 through 4.2, allows remote attackers to guess sensitive values such as DNS transaction IDs by observing a sequence of previously generated values. NOTE: this issue can be leveraged for attacks such as DNS cache poisoning against OpenBSD\u0027s modification of BIND.", "id": "GHSA-c3px-pvp2-35hw", "modified": "2022-05-01T23:37:13Z", "published": "2022-05-01T23:37:13Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-1146" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/40329" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/28819" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securiteam.com/securityreviews/5PP0H0UNGW.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/487658" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/27647" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.trusteer.com/docs/OpenBSD_DNS_Cache_Poisoning_and_Multiple_OS_Predictable_IP_ID_Vulnerability.pdf" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.