GHSA-C5Q6-H25M-P95J

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-24 18:32 – Updated: 2026-06-28 09:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

bpf: Fix stale offload->prog pointer after constant blinding

When a dev-bound-only BPF program (BPF_F_XDP_DEV_BOUND_ONLY) undergoes JIT compilation with constant blinding enabled (bpf_jit_harden >= 2), bpf_jit_blind_constants() clones the program. The original prog is then freed in bpf_jit_prog_release_other(), which updates aux->prog to point to the surviving clone, but fails to update offload->prog.

This leaves offload->prog pointing to the freed original program. When the network namespace is subsequently destroyed, cleanup_net() triggers bpf_dev_bound_netdev_unregister(), which iterates ondev->progs and calls __bpf_prog_offload_destroy(offload->prog). Accessing the freed prog causes a page fault:

BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffc900085f1038 Workqueue: netns cleanup_net RIP: 0010:__bpf_prog_offload_destroy+0xc/0x80 Call Trace: __bpf_offload_dev_netdev_unregister+0x257/0x350 bpf_dev_bound_netdev_unregister+0x4a/0x90 unregister_netdevice_many_notify+0x2a2/0x660 ... cleanup_net+0x21a/0x320

The test sequence that triggers this reliably is:

  1. Set net.core.bpf_jit_harden=2 (echo 2 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_harden)
  2. Run xdp_metadata selftest, which creates a dev-bound-only XDP program on a veth inside a netns (./test_progs -t xdp_metadata)
  3. cleanup_net -> page fault in __bpf_prog_offload_destroy

Dev-bound-only programs are unique in that they have an offload structure but go through the normal JIT path instead of bpf_prog_offload_compile(). This means they are subject to constant blinding's prog clone-and-replace, while also having offload->prog that must stay in sync.

Fix this by updating offload->prog in bpf_jit_prog_release_other(), alongside the existing aux->prog update. Both are back-pointers to the prog that must be kept in sync when the prog is replaced.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-53094"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-24T17:17:23Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbpf: Fix stale offload-\u003eprog pointer after constant blinding\n\nWhen a dev-bound-only BPF program (BPF_F_XDP_DEV_BOUND_ONLY) undergoes\nJIT compilation with constant blinding enabled (bpf_jit_harden \u003e= 2),\nbpf_jit_blind_constants() clones the program. The original prog is then\nfreed in bpf_jit_prog_release_other(), which updates aux-\u003eprog to point\nto the surviving clone, but fails to update offload-\u003eprog.\n\nThis leaves offload-\u003eprog pointing to the freed original program. When\nthe network namespace is subsequently destroyed, cleanup_net() triggers\nbpf_dev_bound_netdev_unregister(), which iterates ondev-\u003eprogs and calls\n__bpf_prog_offload_destroy(offload-\u003eprog). Accessing the freed prog\ncauses a page fault:\n\nBUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffc900085f1038\nWorkqueue: netns cleanup_net\nRIP: 0010:__bpf_prog_offload_destroy+0xc/0x80\nCall Trace:\n__bpf_offload_dev_netdev_unregister+0x257/0x350\nbpf_dev_bound_netdev_unregister+0x4a/0x90\nunregister_netdevice_many_notify+0x2a2/0x660\n...\ncleanup_net+0x21a/0x320\n\nThe test sequence that triggers this reliably is:\n\n1. Set net.core.bpf_jit_harden=2 (echo 2 \u003e /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_harden)\n2. Run xdp_metadata selftest, which creates a dev-bound-only XDP\n   program on a veth inside a netns (./test_progs -t xdp_metadata)\n3. cleanup_net -\u003e page fault in __bpf_prog_offload_destroy\n\nDev-bound-only programs are unique in that they have an offload structure\nbut go through the normal JIT path instead of bpf_prog_offload_compile().\nThis means they are subject to constant blinding\u0027s prog clone-and-replace,\nwhile also having offload-\u003eprog that must stay in sync.\n\nFix this by updating offload-\u003eprog in bpf_jit_prog_release_other(),\nalongside the existing aux-\u003eprog update. Both are back-pointers to\nthe prog that must be kept in sync when the prog is replaced.",
  "id": "GHSA-c5q6-h25m-p95j",
  "modified": "2026-06-28T09:31:41Z",
  "published": "2026-06-24T18:32:46Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53094"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/059525cf18e69a9313baf947d8898c6ee7ca6b65"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/25484c39d1ec82a0368798d956da3de5039b3fe8"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a1aa9ef47c299c5bbc30594d3c2f0589edf908e6"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a713b72ff88cdab4d5d692908ab1259ada511f4d"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c79f8503d83d4665be461fb9e45e215d0380c67b"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…