GHSA-C5VJ-F36Q-P9VG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-03-13 20:51 – Updated: 2023-03-23 16:25Impact
An improper implementation was found in the password storage process.
All hashed passwords stored in Shield v1.0.0-beta.3 or earlier are easier to crack than expected due to the vulnerability. Therefore, they should be removed as soon as possible.
If an attacker gets (1) the user's hashed password by Shield, and (2) the hashed password (SHA-384 hash without salt) from somewhere, the attacker may easily crack the user's password.
Patches
Upgrade to Shield v1.0.0-beta.4 or later.
After upgrading, all users’ hashed passwords should be updated (saved to the database). See https://github.com/codeigniter4/shield/blob/develop/UPGRADING.md for details.
Workarounds
None.
References
- https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Password_Storage_Cheat_Sheet.html#pre-hashing-passwords
- https://blog.ircmaxell.com/2015/03/security-issue-combining-bcrypt-with.html
- https://www.scottbrady91.com/authentication/beware-of-password-shucking
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: * Open an issue or discussion in codeigniter4/shield * Email us at security@codeigniter.com
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "codeigniter4/shield"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.0.0-beta.4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-27580"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-916"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2023-03-13T20:51:07Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2023-03-13T18:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Impact\nAn improper implementation was found in the password storage process.\n\nAll hashed passwords stored in Shield v1.0.0-beta.3 or earlier are easier to crack than expected due to the vulnerability. Therefore, they should be removed as soon as possible.\n\nIf an attacker gets (1) the user\u0027s hashed password by Shield, and (2) the hashed password (SHA-384 hash without salt) from somewhere, the attacker may easily crack the user\u0027s password.\n\n### Patches\nUpgrade to Shield v1.0.0-beta.4 or later.\n\nAfter upgrading, all users\u2019 hashed passwords should be updated (saved to the database).\nSee https://github.com/codeigniter4/shield/blob/develop/UPGRADING.md for details.\n\n### Workarounds\nNone.\n\n### References\n- https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Password_Storage_Cheat_Sheet.html#pre-hashing-passwords\n- https://blog.ircmaxell.com/2015/03/security-issue-combining-bcrypt-with.html\n- https://www.scottbrady91.com/authentication/beware-of-password-shucking\n\n### For more information\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n* Open an issue or discussion in [codeigniter4/shield](https://github.com/codeigniter4/shield)\n* Email us at [security@codeigniter.com](mailto:security@codeigniter.com)\n",
"id": "GHSA-c5vj-f36q-p9vg",
"modified": "2023-03-23T16:25:01Z",
"published": "2023-03-13T20:51:07Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/codeigniter4/shield/security/advisories/GHSA-c5vj-f36q-p9vg"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-27580"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/codeigniter4/shield/commit/ea9688dd01d100193d834117dbfc2cfabcf9ea0b"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://blog.ircmaxell.com/2015/03/security-issue-combining-bcrypt-with.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Password_Storage_Cheat_Sheet.html#pre-hashing-passwords"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/codeigniter4/shield"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/codeigniter4/shield/blob/develop/UPGRADING.md"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.scottbrady91.com/authentication/beware-of-password-shucking"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Password Shucking Vulnerability"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.