GHSA-C68J-74MR-G84M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-08-22 18:31 – Updated: 2025-11-26 00:30
VLAI?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
[ceph] parse_longname(): strrchr() expects NUL-terminated string
... and parse_longname() is not guaranteed that. That's the reason why it uses kmemdup_nul() to build the argument for kstrtou64(); the problem is, kstrtou64() is not the only thing that need it.
Just get a NUL-terminated copy of the entire thing and be done with that...
Severity ?
5.5 (Medium)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-38660"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-08-22T16:15:41Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\n[ceph] parse_longname(): strrchr() expects NUL-terminated string\n\n... and parse_longname() is not guaranteed that. That\u0027s the reason\nwhy it uses kmemdup_nul() to build the argument for kstrtou64();\nthe problem is, kstrtou64() is not the only thing that need it.\n\nJust get a NUL-terminated copy of the entire thing and be done\nwith that...",
"id": "GHSA-c68j-74mr-g84m",
"modified": "2025-11-26T00:30:15Z",
"published": "2025-08-22T18:31:23Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38660"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/101841c38346f4ca41dc1802c867da990ffb32eb"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3145b2b11492d61c512bbc59660bb823bc757f48"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/493479af8af3ab907f49e99323777d498a4fbd2b"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bb80f7618832d26f7e395f52f82b1dac76223e5f"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…