ghsa-c86h-r59x-c7j5
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 03:02
Modified
2022-05-17 03:02
Severity ?
Details
A Denial of Service Vulnerability in 802.11 ingress packet processing of the Cisco Mobility Express 2800 and 3800 Access Points (APs) could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to cause the connection table to be full of invalid connections and be unable to process new incoming requests. More Information: CSCvb66659. Known Affected Releases: 8.2(130.0). Known Fixed Releases: 8.2(131.10) 8.2(131.6) 8.2(141.0) 8.3(104.56) 8.4(1.88) 8.4(1.91).
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2016-9220", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2017-01-26T07:59:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "A Denial of Service Vulnerability in 802.11 ingress packet processing of the Cisco Mobility Express 2800 and 3800 Access Points (APs) could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to cause the connection table to be full of invalid connections and be unable to process new incoming requests. More Information: CSCvb66659. Known Affected Releases: 8.2(130.0). Known Fixed Releases: 8.2(131.10) 8.2(131.6) 8.2(141.0) 8.3(104.56) 8.4(1.88) 8.4(1.91).", id: "GHSA-c86h-r59x-c7j5", modified: "2022-05-17T03:02:39Z", published: "2022-05-17T03:02:39Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-9220", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20170118-cme1", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95633", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.