GHSA-C982-GVW7-5X8V
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 00:58 – Updated: 2022-05-14 00:58
VLAI?
Details
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in main.php in Contao (formerly TYPOlight) 2.11.0 and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) delete users via a delete action in the user module, (2) delete news via a delete action in the news module, or (3) delete newsletters via a delete action in the newsletters module.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2012-1297"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2012-03-19T18:55:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in main.php in Contao (formerly TYPOlight) 2.11.0 and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) delete users via a delete action in the user module, (2) delete news via a delete action in the news module, or (3) delete newsletters via a delete action in the newsletters module.",
"id": "GHSA-c982-gvw7-5x8v",
"modified": "2022-05-14T00:58:34Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T00:58:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-1297"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/73479"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://ivanobinetti.blogspot.com/2012/02/contaocms-fka-typolight-211-csrf-delete.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.org/files/110214/ContaoCMS-2.11.0-Cross-Site-Request-Forgery.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/48180"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/18527"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…