GHSA-C9HP-6RXJ-H2WX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-11-06 21:31 – Updated: 2025-11-24 21:30
VLAI?
Details
SuiteCRM versions prior to 7.12.6 contain a type confusion vulnerability within the processing of the ‘module’ parameter within the ‘deleteAttachment’ functionality. Successful exploitation allows remote unauthenticated attackers to alter database objects including changing the email address of the administrator.
Severity ?
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-50590"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-843"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-11-06T20:15:36Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "SuiteCRM versions prior to 7.12.6 contain a type confusion vulnerability within the\u00a0processing of the \u2018module\u2019 parameter within the \u2018deleteAttachment\u2019 functionality. Successful exploitation allows remote unauthenticated attackers to alter database objects including changing the email address of the administrator.",
"id": "GHSA-c9hp-6rxj-h2wx",
"modified": "2025-11-24T21:30:57Z",
"published": "2025-11-06T21:31:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-50590"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://blog.exodusintel.com/2022/06/09/salesagility-suitecrm-deleteattachment-type-confusion-vulnerability"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://docs.suitecrm.com/admin/releases/7.12.x/#_7_12_6"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/suitecrm-type-confusion-via-deleteattachment-functionality"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…