ghsa-cc8r-2q55-6c87
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 04:09
Modified
2022-05-17 04:09
Details
The (1) Service Provider (SP) and (2) Identity Provider (IdP) in PicketLink before 2.7.0 does not ensure that the Destination attribute in a Response element in a SAML assertion matches the location from which the message was received, which allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via unknown vectors. NOTE: this identifier was SPLIT from CVE-2015-0277 per ADT2 due to different vulnerability types.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2015-6254" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2015-08-17T20:59:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "The (1) Service Provider (SP) and (2) Identity Provider (IdP) in PicketLink before 2.7.0 does not ensure that the Destination attribute in a Response element in a SAML assertion matches the location from which the message was received, which allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via unknown vectors. NOTE: this identifier was SPLIT from CVE-2015-0277 per ADT2 due to different vulnerability types.", "id": "GHSA-cc8r-2q55-6c87", "modified": "2022-05-17T04:09:27Z", "published": "2022-05-17T04:09:27Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-6254" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194832" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLINK-680" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0846.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0847.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0848.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0849.html" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.