ghsa-cc95-pv6q-rgmh
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:46
Modified
2022-05-13 01:46
Severity ?
Details
The gst_riff_create_audio_caps function in gst-libs/gst/riff/riff-media.c in gst-plugins-base in GStreamer before 1.10.3 does not properly limit recursion, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (stack overflow and crash) via vectors involving nested WAVEFORMATEX.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2017-5839" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-674" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2017-02-09T15:59:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "The gst_riff_create_audio_caps function in gst-libs/gst/riff/riff-media.c in gst-plugins-base in GStreamer before 1.10.3 does not properly limit recursion, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (stack overflow and crash) via vectors involving nested WAVEFORMATEX.", "id": "GHSA-cc95-pv6q-rgmh", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:46:20Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:46:20Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-5839" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2060" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=777265" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/releases/1.10/#1.10.3" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201705-10" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3819" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/02/01/7" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/02/02/9" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96001" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.