ghsa-ccm9-9gxr-9m3p
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:48
Modified
2022-05-13 01:48
Severity ?
Details
In LibTIFF 4.0.8, there is a heap-based buffer overflow in the t2p_write_pdf function in tools/tiff2pdf.c. This heap overflow could lead to different damages. For example, a crafted TIFF document can lead to an out-of-bounds read in TIFFCleanup, an invalid free in TIFFClose or t2p_free, memory corruption in t2p_readwrite_pdf_image, or a double free in t2p_free. Given these possibilities, it probably could cause arbitrary code execution.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2017-9935" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-125" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2017-06-26T12:29:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "In LibTIFF 4.0.8, there is a heap-based buffer overflow in the t2p_write_pdf function in tools/tiff2pdf.c. This heap overflow could lead to different damages. For example, a crafted TIFF document can lead to an out-of-bounds read in TIFFCleanup, an invalid free in TIFFClose or t2p_free, memory corruption in t2p_readwrite_pdf_image, or a double free in t2p_free. Given these possibilities, it probably could cause arbitrary code execution.", "id": "GHSA-ccm9-9gxr-9m3p", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:48:13Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:48:13Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-9935" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2017/12/msg00008.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/3606-1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4100" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2704" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/99296" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.