ghsa-cf96-w592-hc5w
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-05-17 15:31
Modified
2024-05-17 15:31
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

btrfs: zoned: fix lock ordering in btrfs_zone_activate()

The btrfs CI reported a lockdep warning as follows by running generic generic/129.

WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.7.0-rc5+ #1 Not tainted


kworker/u5:5/793427 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88813256d028 (&cache->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: btrfs_zone_finish_one_bg+0x5e/0x130 but task is already holding lock: ffff88810a23a318 (&fs_info->zone_active_bgs_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: btrfs_zone_finish_one_bg+0x34/0x130 which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&fs_info->zone_active_bgs_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}: ... -> #0 (&cache->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}: ...

This is because we take fs_info->zone_active_bgs_lock after a block_group's lock in btrfs_zone_activate() while doing the opposite in other places.

Fix the issue by expanding the fs_info->zone_active_bgs_lock's critical section and taking it before a block_group's lock.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-52668"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-05-17T14:15:09Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbtrfs: zoned: fix lock ordering in btrfs_zone_activate()\n\nThe btrfs CI reported a lockdep warning as follows by running generic\ngeneric/129.\n\n   WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected\n   6.7.0-rc5+ #1 Not tainted\n   ------------------------------------------------------\n   kworker/u5:5/793427 is trying to acquire lock:\n   ffff88813256d028 (\u0026cache-\u003elock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: btrfs_zone_finish_one_bg+0x5e/0x130\n   but task is already holding lock:\n   ffff88810a23a318 (\u0026fs_info-\u003ezone_active_bgs_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: btrfs_zone_finish_one_bg+0x34/0x130\n   which lock already depends on the new lock.\n\n   the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:\n   -\u003e #1 (\u0026fs_info-\u003ezone_active_bgs_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}:\n   ...\n   -\u003e #0 (\u0026cache-\u003elock){+.+.}-{2:2}:\n   ...\n\nThis is because we take fs_info-\u003ezone_active_bgs_lock after a block_group\u0027s\nlock in btrfs_zone_activate() while doing the opposite in other places.\n\nFix the issue by expanding the fs_info-\u003ezone_active_bgs_lock\u0027s critical\nsection and taking it before a block_group\u0027s lock.",
  "id": "GHSA-cf96-w592-hc5w",
  "modified": "2024-05-17T15:31:09Z",
  "published": "2024-05-17T15:31:09Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52668"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1908e9d01e5395adff68d9d308a0fb15337e6272"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6f74989f5909cdec9b1274641f0fa306b15bb476"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b18f3b60b35a8c01c9a2a0f0d6424c6d73971dc3"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...
  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.