GHSA-CFGM-R5HJ-FCVM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 02:17 – Updated: 2022-05-01 02:17
VLAI?
Details
Multiple interpretation error in Panda Titanium 2005 4.02.01 allows remote attackers to bypass virus scanning via a file such as BAT, HTML, and EML with an "MZ" magic byte sequence which is normally associated with EXE, which causes the file to be treated as a safe type that could still be executed as a dangerous file type by applications on the end system, as demonstrated by a "triple headed" program that contains EXE, EML, and HTML content, aka the "magic byte bug."
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2005-3380"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2005-10-30T14:34:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Multiple interpretation error in Panda Titanium 2005 4.02.01 allows remote attackers to bypass virus scanning via a file such as BAT, HTML, and EML with an \"MZ\" magic byte sequence which is normally associated with EXE, which causes the file to be treated as a safe type that could still be executed as a dangerous file type by applications on the end system, as demonstrated by a \"triple headed\" program that contains EXE, EML, and HTML content, aka the \"magic byte bug.\"",
"id": "GHSA-cfgm-r5hj-fcvm",
"modified": "2022-05-01T02:17:17Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T02:17:17Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-3380"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=113026417802703\u0026w=2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityelf.org/magicbyte.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityelf.org/magicbyteadv.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityelf.org/updmagic.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/15189"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…