GHSA-CG3C-PJ78-HRH5
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-30 18:17 – Updated: 2022-04-30 18:17
VLAI?
Details
PGP Corporate Desktop before 7.1, Personal Security before 7.0.3, Freeware before 7.0.3, and E-Business Server before 7.1 does not properly display when invalid userID's are used to sign a message, which could allow an attacker to make the user believe that the document has been signed by a trusted third party by adding a second, invalid user ID to a key which has already been signed by the third party, aka the "PGPsdk Key Validity Vulnerability."
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2001-1016"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2001-09-04T04:00:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "PGP Corporate Desktop before 7.1, Personal Security before 7.0.3, Freeware before 7.0.3, and E-Business Server before 7.1 does not properly display when invalid userID\u0027s are used to sign a message, which could allow an attacker to make the user believe that the document has been signed by a trusted third party by adding a second, invalid user ID to a key which has already been signed by the third party, aka the \"PGPsdk Key Validity Vulnerability.\"",
"id": "GHSA-cg3c-pj78-hrh5",
"modified": "2022-04-30T18:17:11Z",
"published": "2022-04-30T18:17:11Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2001-1016"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/7081"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/1946"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.pgp.com/support/product-advisories/pgpsdk.asp"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/211806"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/3280"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…