GHSA-CHVP-27P2-W8XJ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-16 06:30 – Updated: 2026-08-16 06:30
VLAI
Details

The WC Vendors – WooCommerce Multivendor, WooCommerce Marketplace, Product Vendors plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to generic SQL Injection via the 'status' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 2.7.0 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation on the existing SQL query. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with shop manager-level access and above, to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database. The sanitize_text_field callback strips HTML but leaves SQL metacharacters intact, and wp_magic_quotes slash protection does not apply because WP_REST_Server::serve_request() calls wp_unslash() on GET parameters before the sanitize callback executes.

Severity
4.9 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-15351"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-89"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-16T06:16:50Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The WC Vendors \u2013 WooCommerce Multivendor, WooCommerce Marketplace, Product Vendors plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to generic SQL Injection via the \u0027status\u0027 parameter in all versions up to, and including, 2.7.0 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation on the existing SQL query. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with shop manager-level access and above, to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database. The sanitize_text_field callback strips HTML but leaves SQL metacharacters intact, and wp_magic_quotes slash protection does not apply because WP_REST_Server::serve_request() calls wp_unslash() on GET parameters before the sanitize callback executes.",
  "id": "GHSA-chvp-27p2-w8xj",
  "modified": "2026-08-16T06:30:25Z",
  "published": "2026-08-16T06:30:25Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-15351"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wc-vendors/tags/2.7.0/classes/includes/api/admin/class-wcv-admin-api.php#L247"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wc-vendors/tags/2.7.0/classes/includes/api/admin/class-wcv-admin-api.php#L329"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wc-vendors/tags/2.7.0/classes/includes/api/admin/class-wcv-admin-api.php#L367"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wc-vendors/tags/2.7.0/classes/includes/api/admin/class-wcv-admin-api.php#L56"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?reponame=\u0026old=3633716%40wc-vendors\u0026new=3633716%40wc-vendors"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/df790bbc-7427-4f7e-9aa2-e137c9fceffd?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.