GHSA-CMH5-QC8W-XVCQ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2018-07-24 19:58 – Updated: 2023-09-08 23:58
VLAI?
Summary
Cross-Site Scripting in i18next
Details

Affected versions of i18next may fail to sanitize user input when certain configuration options are used. When using the .init method, passing interpolation options without passing an escapeValue will default to undefined rather than the assumed true.

Proof of Concept

var init = i18n.init({
  interpolation: {
    prefix: "__",
    suffix: "__",
    escapeValue: true
  }
}, function(){
  var test = i18n.t('__firstName__ __lastName__', {
        firstName: 'Bob',
        lastName: '["foo","bar"]',
  });
  console.log(test);
});

When escapeValue is explicitly passed, the result of test is:

<script>alert(1)</script> Johnson

This is supposed to be the default. However, if escapeValue is not included, the result is the unescaped string:

<script>alert(1)</script> Johnson

Recommendation

Update to version 3.4.4 or later.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "i18next"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.4.4"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2017-16010"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-79"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2020-06-16T21:31:57Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Affected versions of `i18next` may fail to sanitize user input when certain configuration options are used. When using the `.init` method, passing interpolation options without passing an `escapeValue` will default to `undefined` rather than the assumed `true`. \n\n## Proof of Concept\n\n```js\nvar init = i18n.init({\n  interpolation: {\n    prefix: \"__\",\n    suffix: \"__\",\n    escapeValue: true\n  }\n}, function(){\n  var test = i18n.t(\u0027__firstName__ __lastName__\u0027, {\n        firstName: \u0027Bob\u0027,\n        lastName: \u0027[\"foo\",\"bar\"]\u0027,\n  });\n  console.log(test);\n});\n```\nWhen `escapeValue` is explicitly passed, the result of `test` is: \n\n```html\n\u0026lt;script\u0026gt;alert(1)\u0026lt;\u0026#x2F;script\u0026gt; Johnson\n```\n\nThis is supposed to be the default. However, if `escapeValue` is not included, the result is the unescaped string: \n \n```html\n\u003cscript\u003ealert(1)\u003c/script\u003e Johnson\n```\n\n\n## Recommendation\n\nUpdate to version 3.4.4 or later.",
  "id": "GHSA-cmh5-qc8w-xvcq",
  "modified": "2023-09-08T23:58:14Z",
  "published": "2018-07-24T19:58:33Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-16010"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/i18next/i18next/pull/826"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-cmh5-qc8w-xvcq"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.npmjs.com/advisories/326"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Cross-Site Scripting in i18next"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…