ghsa-cmw5-crx2-gx7r
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 01:18
Modified
2022-05-14 01:18
Details
The (1) ssh2_load_userkey and (2) ssh2_save_userkey functions in PuTTY 0.51 through 0.63 do not properly wipe SSH-2 private keys from memory, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading the memory.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2015-2157", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-200", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2015-03-27T14:59:00Z", severity: "LOW", }, details: "The (1) ssh2_load_userkey and (2) ssh2_save_userkey functions in PuTTY 0.51 through 0.63 do not properly wipe SSH-2 private keys from memory, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading the memory.", id: "GHSA-cmw5-crx2-gx7r", modified: "2022-05-14T01:18:14Z", published: "2022-05-14T01:18:14Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-2157", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-March/151790.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-March/151839.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-March/151933.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-03/msg00032.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/changes.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/wishlist/private-key-not-wiped-2.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3190", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/02/28/4", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/02/28/5", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/72825", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.