GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-CPH6-524F-3HGR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-11-13 23:07 – Updated: 2025-11-15 03:15
VLAI
Summary
Directus Vulnerable to Information Leakage in Existing Collections
Details

Summary:

An observable difference in error messaging was found in the Directus REST API. The /items/{collection} API returns different error messages for these two cases: 1. A user tries to access an existing collection which they are not authorized to access. 2. A user tries to access a non-existing collection.

The two differing error messages leak the existence of collections to users which are not authorized to access these collections.

Details:

The following response returns an error message, when requesting a collection the user is not authorized to access.

GET /items/no-access
{
  "errors": [
    {
      "message": "You don't have permission to access collection \"no-access\" or it does not exist. Queried in root.",
      "extensions": {
        "reason": "You don't have permission to access collection \"no-access\" or it does not exist. Queried in root.",
        "code": "FORBIDDEN"
      }
    }
  ]
}

The following response returns a different error message when requesting a collection which does not exist.

GET /items/does-not-exist
{
  "errors": [
    {
      "message": "You don't have permission to access this.",
      "extensions": {
        "code": "FORBIDDEN"
      }
    }
  ]
}

Impact:

The difference in errors between non-existent collections and collections blocked by permissions leak the existence of a collection to a user which is not authorized to access this object.

Credit:

Sebastian Krause - Hackmanit GmbH

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "directus"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "11.13.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "@directus/api"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "32.0.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-64749"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-203",
      "CWE-209"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2025-11-13T23:07:31Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-11-13T22:15:52Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary:\n\nAn observable difference in error messaging was found in the Directus REST API. The `/items/{collection}` API returns different error messages for these two cases:\n1. A user tries to access an existing collection which they are not authorized to access.\n2. A user tries to access a non-existing collection.\n\nThe two differing error messages leak the existence of collections to users which are not authorized to access these collections.\n\n### Details:\n\nThe following response returns an error message, when requesting a collection the user is not authorized to access.\n\n```\nGET /items/no-access\n{\n  \"errors\": [\n    {\n      \"message\": \"You don\u0027t have permission to access collection \\\"no-access\\\" or it does not exist. Queried in root.\",\n      \"extensions\": {\n        \"reason\": \"You don\u0027t have permission to access collection \\\"no-access\\\" or it does not exist. Queried in root.\",\n        \"code\": \"FORBIDDEN\"\n      }\n    }\n  ]\n}\n```\n\nThe following response returns a different error message when requesting a collection which does not exist.\n\n```\nGET /items/does-not-exist\n{\n  \"errors\": [\n    {\n      \"message\": \"You don\u0027t have permission to access this.\",\n      \"extensions\": {\n        \"code\": \"FORBIDDEN\"\n      }\n    }\n  ]\n}\n```\n\n### Impact:\n\nThe difference in errors between non-existent collections and collections blocked by permissions leak the existence of a collection to a user which is not authorized to access this object.\n\n### Credit:\n\nSebastian Krause - [Hackmanit GmbH](https://hackmanit.de)",
  "id": "GHSA-cph6-524f-3hgr",
  "modified": "2025-11-15T03:15:40Z",
  "published": "2025-11-13T23:07:31Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/directus/directus/security/advisories/GHSA-cph6-524f-3hgr"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-64749"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/directus/directus/commit/f99c9b89071f9d136cc9b0d0c182f2d24542bc31"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/directus/directus"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Directus Vulnerable to Information Leakage in Existing Collections"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…