GHSA-CPX8-R248-XRJ3

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 05:28 – Updated: 2022-05-17 05:28
VLAI?
Details

Cisco Unified Communications Manager (aka CUCM, formerly CallManager) 6.x, 7.x before 7.1(5b)su4, 8.0, and 8.5 before 8.5(1)su2 and Cisco Unified Presence Server 6.x, 7.x, 8.0, and 8.5 before 8.5xnr allow remote attackers to read database data by connecting to a query interface through an SSL session, aka Bug IDs CSCti81574, CSCto63060, CSCto72183, and CSCto73833.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2011-1643"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-200"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2011-08-29T15:55:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Cisco Unified Communications Manager (aka CUCM, formerly CallManager) 6.x, 7.x before 7.1(5b)su4, 8.0, and 8.5 before 8.5(1)su2 and Cisco Unified Presence Server 6.x, 7.x, 8.0, and 8.5 before 8.5xnr allow remote attackers to read database data by connecting to a query interface through an SSL session, aka Bug IDs CSCti81574, CSCto63060, CSCto72183, and CSCto73833.",
  "id": "GHSA-cpx8-r248-xrj3",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T05:28:36Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T05:28:36Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-1643"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080b8f532.shtml"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…