ghsa-cpx8-r248-xrj3
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 05:28
Modified
2022-05-17 05:28
Details

Cisco Unified Communications Manager (aka CUCM, formerly CallManager) 6.x, 7.x before 7.1(5b)su4, 8.0, and 8.5 before 8.5(1)su2 and Cisco Unified Presence Server 6.x, 7.x, 8.0, and 8.5 before 8.5xnr allow remote attackers to read database data by connecting to a query interface through an SSL session, aka Bug IDs CSCti81574, CSCto63060, CSCto72183, and CSCto73833.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2011-1643"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-200"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2011-08-29T15:55:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Cisco Unified Communications Manager (aka CUCM, formerly CallManager) 6.x, 7.x before 7.1(5b)su4, 8.0, and 8.5 before 8.5(1)su2 and Cisco Unified Presence Server 6.x, 7.x, 8.0, and 8.5 before 8.5xnr allow remote attackers to read database data by connecting to a query interface through an SSL session, aka Bug IDs CSCti81574, CSCto63060, CSCto72183, and CSCto73833.",
  "id": "GHSA-cpx8-r248-xrj3",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T05:28:36Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T05:28:36Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-1643"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080b8f532.shtml"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.