ghsa-cq3m-3v79-qmrp
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:05
Modified
2022-05-13 01:05
Details

The TCP reassembly feature in Cisco IOS XE 3.7 before 3.7.3S and 3.8 before 3.8.1S on 1000 ASR devices allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via large TCP packets that are processed by the (1) NAT or (2) ALG component, aka Bug ID CSCud72509.

Show details on source website


{
   affected: [],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2013-5546",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [
         "CWE-20",
      ],
      github_reviewed: false,
      github_reviewed_at: null,
      nvd_published_at: "2013-10-31T21:55:00Z",
      severity: "HIGH",
   },
   details: "The TCP reassembly feature in Cisco IOS XE 3.7 before 3.7.3S and 3.8 before 3.8.1S on 1000 ASR devices allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via large TCP packets that are processed by the (1) NAT or (2) ALG component, aka Bug ID CSCud72509.",
   id: "GHSA-cq3m-3v79-qmrp",
   modified: "2022-05-13T01:05:40Z",
   published: "2022-05-13T01:05:40Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-5546",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20131030-asr1000",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.