GHSA-CQ9W-MFCC-7Q5J

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-15 06:32 – Updated: 2026-08-17 06:33
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ASoC: SDCA: Validate written enum value in ge_put_enum_double()

ge_put_enum_double() passes the user-supplied enumeration index item[0] to snd_soc_enum_item_to_val() without checking it against the number of items in the enum:

ret = snd_soc_enum_item_to_val(e, item[0]);

snd_soc_enum_item_to_val() indexes the heap-allocated e->values[] array with that index (e->values is set from a devm_kcalloc() of e->items entries), so a control write with an out-of-range item[0] reads past the end of the values buffer. The bounds check in snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_double() only runs afterwards, so it does not prevent the read here.

Reject an out-of-range item before using it, matching the other enum put handlers.

This issue was pointed out by the Sashiko AI review bot while reviewing a related enum-validation series: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260609125735.CEB651F00893@smtp.kernel.org/

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-72415"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-15T06:22:15Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nASoC: SDCA: Validate written enum value in ge_put_enum_double()\n\nge_put_enum_double() passes the user-supplied enumeration index\nitem[0] to snd_soc_enum_item_to_val() without checking it against the\nnumber of items in the enum:\n\n\tret = snd_soc_enum_item_to_val(e, item[0]);\n\nsnd_soc_enum_item_to_val() indexes the heap-allocated e-\u003evalues[] array\nwith that index (e-\u003evalues is set from a devm_kcalloc() of e-\u003eitems\nentries), so a control write with an out-of-range item[0] reads past the\nend of the values buffer.  The bounds check in\nsnd_soc_dapm_put_enum_double() only runs afterwards, so it does not\nprevent the read here.\n\nReject an out-of-range item before using it, matching the other enum put\nhandlers.\n\nThis issue was pointed out by the Sashiko AI review bot while reviewing a\nrelated enum-validation series:\nhttps://lore.kernel.org/all/20260609125735.CEB651F00893@smtp.kernel.org/",
  "id": "GHSA-cq9w-mfcc-7q5j",
  "modified": "2026-08-17T06:33:28Z",
  "published": "2026-08-15T06:32:23Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-72415"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1ce42a11bed134903e352010a01fa53073a6b395"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/33387bf9bb6116a0429f823f8dab3accf8f8e09c"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…