ghsa-cr25-xc39-jfqp
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 05:07
Modified
2022-05-17 05:07
Details
Buffer overflow in the atodn function in strongSwan 2.0.0 through 4.3.4, when Opportunistic Encryption is enabled and an RSA key is being used, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (pluto IKE daemon crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via crafted DNS TXT records. NOTE: this might be the same vulnerability as CVE-2013-2053 and CVE-2013-2054.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2013-2054" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2013-07-09T17:55:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Buffer overflow in the atodn function in strongSwan 2.0.0 through 4.3.4, when Opportunistic Encryption is enabled and an RSA key is being used, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (pluto IKE daemon crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via crafted DNS TXT records. NOTE: this might be the same vulnerability as CVE-2013-2053 and CVE-2013-2054.", "id": "GHSA-cr25-xc39-jfqp", "modified": "2022-05-17T05:07:35Z", "published": "2022-05-17T05:07:35Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-2054" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.libreswan.org/pipermail/swan-announce/2013/000003.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://download.strongswan.org/security/CVE-2013-2054/CVE-2013-2054.txt" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/59837" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.