ghsa-crr9-5rqj-fxgq
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 07:27
Modified
2022-05-01 07:27
Details
Stack-based buffer overflow in an ActiveX control used in Symantec Automated Support Assistant, as used in Norton AntiVirus, Internet Security, and System Works 2005 and 2006, allows user-assisted remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2006-5403" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2006-10-19T01:07:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Stack-based buffer overflow in an ActiveX control used in Symantec Automated Support Assistant, as used in Norton AntiVirus, Internet Security, and System Works 2005 and 2006, allows user-assisted remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.", "id": "GHSA-crr9-5rqj-fxgq", "modified": "2022-05-01T07:27:59Z", "published": "2022-05-01T07:27:59Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-5403" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/29363" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/22228" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/security/Content/2006.10.05.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1016988" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1016989" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1016990" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1016991" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/400601" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/20348" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/3929" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.