GHSA-CVF6-XM2V-CQ3C
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-29 01:27 – Updated: 2025-04-03 03:56
VLAI?
Details
The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) implementation in multiple Cisco products including IP Phone models 7940 and 7960, IOS versions in the 12.2 train, and Secure PIX 5.2.9 to 6.2.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via crafted INVITE messages, as demonstrated by the OUSPG PROTOS c07-sip test suite.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2003-1109"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2003-12-31T05:00:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) implementation in multiple Cisco products including IP Phone models 7940 and 7960, IOS versions in the 12.2 train, and Secure PIX 5.2.9 to 6.2.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via crafted INVITE messages, as demonstrated by the OUSPG PROTOS c07-sip test suite.",
"id": "GHSA-cvf6-xm2v-cq3c",
"modified": "2025-04-03T03:56:23Z",
"published": "2022-04-29T01:27:32Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2003-1109"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/11379"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2003-06.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20030221-protos.shtml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.ee.oulu.fi/research/ouspg/protos/testing/c07/sip"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/528719"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/6904"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1006143"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1006144"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1006145"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…