ghsa-cw6w-q88j-6mqf
Vulnerability from github
Published
2019-11-08 17:12
Modified
2021-06-15 17:21
Severity ?
Summary
Potential session hijack in Apache CXF
Details
Apache CXF before 3.3.4 and 3.2.11 provides all of the components that are required to build a fully fledged OpenId Connect service. There is a vulnerability in the access token services, where it does not validate that the authenticated principal is equal to that of the supplied clientId parameter in the request. If a malicious client was able to somehow steal an authorization code issued to another client, then they could exploit this vulnerability to obtain an access token for the other client.
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "Maven", "name": "org.apache.cxf:cxf" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" }, { "fixed": "3.2.11" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] }, { "package": { "ecosystem": "Maven", "name": "org.apache.cxf:cxf" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "3.3.0" }, { "fixed": "3.3.4" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2019-12419" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-863" ], "github_reviewed": true, "github_reviewed_at": "2019-11-07T23:18:50Z", "nvd_published_at": "2019-11-06T21:15:00Z", "severity": "CRITICAL" }, "details": "Apache CXF before 3.3.4 and 3.2.11 provides all of the components that are required to build a fully fledged OpenId Connect service. There is a vulnerability in the access token services, where it does not validate that the authenticated principal is equal to that of the supplied clientId parameter in the request. If a malicious client was able to somehow steal an authorization code issued to another client, then they could exploit this vulnerability to obtain an access token for the other client.", "id": "GHSA-cw6w-q88j-6mqf", "modified": "2021-06-15T17:21:24Z", "published": "2019-11-08T17:12:59Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-12419" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r36e44ffc1a9b365327df62cdfaabe85b9a5637de102cea07d79b2dbf@%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3E" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r861eb1a9e0250e9150215b17f0263edf62becd5e20fc96251cff59f6@%3Cdev.cxf.apache.org%3E" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc774278135816e7afc943dc9fc78eb0764f2c84a2b96470a0187315c@%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3E" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rd49aabd984ed540c8ff7916d4d79405f3fa311d2fdbcf9ed307839a6@%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3E" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/re7593a274ee0a85d304d5d42c66fc0081c94d7f22bc96a1084d43b80@%3Cdev.cxf.apache.org%3E" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rec7160382badd3ef4ad017a22f64a266c7188b9ba71394f0d321e2d4@%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3E" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ree5fc719e330f82ae38a2b0050c91f18ed5b878312dc0b9e0b9815be@%3Cdev.cxf.apache.org%3E" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb87e0bf3995e7d560afeed750fac9329ff5f1ad49da365129b7f89e@%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3E" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rff42cfa5e7d75b7c1af0e37589140a8f1999e578a75738740b244bd4@%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3E" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuApr2021.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2020.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2020.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://cxf.apache.org/security-advisories.data/CVE-2019-12419.txt.asc" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ], "summary": "Potential session hijack in Apache CXF " }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.