GHSA-CWJQ-HQ44-JW63
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:11 – Updated: 2025-04-11 03:58
VLAI
Details
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Best Practical Solutions RT before 3.8.12 and 4.x before 4.0.6 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2011-2085"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2012-06-04T19:55:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Best Practical Solutions RT before 3.8.12 and 4.x before 4.0.6 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.",
"id": "GHSA-cwjq-hq44-jw63",
"modified": "2025-04-11T03:58:04Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:11:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-2085"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf9fa47ab66495c78bb4120b0754dd9531ca2ff0430f6685ac9b07772%40%3Cdev.mina.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf9fa47ab66495c78bb4120b0754dd9531ca2ff0430f6685ac9b07772@%3Cdev.mina.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2012-May/000202.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2012-May/000203.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2012-May/000204.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/49259"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/53660"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…