ghsa-f34v-4q4f-pf5q
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-08-12 15:30
Modified
2024-08-12 15:30
Severity ?
Details
A NULL pointer dereference flaw was found in the ub_ctx_set_fwd function in Unbound. This issue could allow an attacker who can invoke specific sequences of API calls to cause a segmentation fault. When certain API functions such as ub_ctx_set_fwd and ub_ctx_resolvconf are called in a particular order, the program attempts to read from a NULL pointer, leading to a crash. This issue can result in a denial of service by causing the application to terminate unexpectedly.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2024-43167", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-476", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2024-08-12T13:38:35Z", severity: "LOW", }, details: "A NULL pointer dereference flaw was found in the ub_ctx_set_fwd function in Unbound. This issue could allow an attacker who can invoke specific sequences of API calls to cause a segmentation fault. When certain API functions such as ub_ctx_set_fwd and ub_ctx_resolvconf are called in a particular order, the program attempts to read from a NULL pointer, leading to a crash. This issue can result in a denial of service by causing the application to terminate unexpectedly.", id: "GHSA-f34v-4q4f-pf5q", modified: "2024-08-12T15:30:51Z", published: "2024-08-12T15:30:51Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43167", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/NLnetLabs/unbound/issues/1072", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/NLnetLabs/unbound/pull/1073/files", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-43167", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303456", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.