ghsa-f399-ff4w-62fm
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-09-22 00:00
Modified
2022-09-25 00:00
Severity ?
Details
In Erlang/OTP before 23.3.4.15, 24.x before 24.3.4.2, and 25.x before 25.0.2, there is a Client Authentication Bypass in certain client-certification situations for SSL, TLS, and DTLS.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2022-37026", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-287", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2022-09-21T14:15:00Z", severity: "CRITICAL", }, details: "In Erlang/OTP before 23.3.4.15, 24.x before 24.3.4.2, and 25.x before 25.0.2, there is a Client Authentication Bypass in certain client-certification situations for SSL, TLS, and DTLS.", id: "GHSA-f399-ff4w-62fm", modified: "2022-09-25T00:00:20Z", published: "2022-09-22T00:00:30Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-37026", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://erlangforums.com/c/erlang-news-announcements/91", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://erlangforums.com/t/otp-25-1-released/1854", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/erlang/otp/compare/OTP-23.3.4.14...OTP-23.3.4.15", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/07/msg00012.html", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.